V R C O R P O R A T E N E X T

CENTER
GLOBAL
for
APPLIED SCIENCES
&
STUDIES

INDEXES
ANALYSIS
INSIGHTS
RESEARCH
ASSESSMENT
FRACTURED HORIZONS AND SHADOWS OUTLOOK
Scientific Mastery and the Metamorphosis of Warfare Reckoning Late 2026.
Author: Giovambattista Scuticchio Foderaro . Founder . President . Director at CENTER for GLOBAL STUDIES & Applied Sciences
Associate Member at CENTRO STUDI ESERCITO . ITALIAN ARMY STUDIES CENTER
In the shifting geopolitical landscape of late May 2026, the world remains perched on multiple precipices. Warfare has evolved into a hyper-convergent domain where Scientific Mastery directly intersects with existential risks across neural, quantum, biological, hypersonic, informational, and autonomous substrates. Agentic-AI systems scale rapidly from laboratory settings to battlefield decision-making agents capable of multi-step planning and execution. Strategic advantage now depends on who can most effectively fuse computational sciences, materials engineering, neuroscience, cybernetics, synthetic biology, distributed sensing, and AI-enabled decision architectures into coherent national-security ecosystems.
Quantum-resilient cryptography counters “harvest-now-decrypt-later” threats amid accelerating quantum utility - a tactic that targets data with long-term value. Adversaries (often nation-states) are already intercepting and storing vast amounts of encrypted data today, such as emails, web traffic, and files, even though they can’t read it yet. They plan to decrypt it years later once quantum computers mature, using Shor’s algorithm, which can efficiently break the math behind current public-key systems like RSA and ECC.
Ultra-high-temperature ceramics (UHTCs) and advanced materials sustain hypersonic regimes beyond Mach 5 up to 10, while CRISPR-derived and other biotech enhancements push the endurance limits of both human operators and synthetic systems. At VR CORPORATENEXT, we assist major powers to undertake accelerating the transition toward algorithmically assisted command structures in which large-scale sensor fusion, autonomous targeting support, predictive logistics, and AI-assisted operational planning compress the observe–orient–decide–act (OODA) loop to unprecedented speeds.

Beyond encryption disruption risks, states are investing in quantum sensing, quantum navigation, and quantum-enhanced optimisation systems that could reduce dependence on vulnerable satellite infrastructure and improve submarine detection, ISR precision, and battlefield communications resilience. The race is no longer solely for computational supremacy, but for informational asymmetry: the ability to perceive, predict, and adapt faster than adversaries across contested domains.
Bio-digital convergence is expanding warfare beyond traditional doctrine through synthetic biology, neurotechnology, brain-computer interfaces, and human-performance optimisation. Defence actors are increasingly exploring cognitive enhancement, fatigue resistance, accelerated recovery, adaptive training, and biologically informed operational planning, while the dual-use nature of these technologies creates significant proliferation, ethical, and governance risks.
Scientific Mastery is equally reshaping the “dark side” of modern conflict, as illicit procurement networks, sanctioned-state laboratories, extremist organisations, mercenary structures, organised cyber-criminal syndicates, and transnational proxy actors, increasingly exploit dual-use technologies once restricted to advanced state programs.
The metamorphosis continues to reward nations that master convergence as resilient critical-materials supply chains, STEM-strategy talent pipelines, rigorous agent-based red-teaming and simulation, and robust ethical-technical guardrails for autonomous and cognitive warfare systems.

Scientific-Military Power in the Era of Systemic Strategic Competition.
In an era defined by accelerating technological convergence amid great-power systemic rivalry, the military and strategic domains are undergoing a profound metamorphosis. From proliferated orbital mega-constellations underwriting resilient kill webs to gene-edited operators integrated via brain-computer interfaces, the battlefields of 2030 are being architected in the laboratories and command centers of today. This demands not merely doctrinal adaptation but rigorous ethical recalibration, systemic risk governance, and foresight-driven geostrategic positioning.
Agentic-AI and multimodal transformer architectures constitute the cognitive engine that propels modern operations, excelling in sensor fusion, autonomous orchestration, and dynamic decision synthesis; these systems reduce human latency while mitigating epistemic uncertainty in contested environments.
The US Department of Defense has operationalised “AI-first” doctrines through strategic collaborations with entities such as OpenAI, Google, and NVIDIA, embedding frontier models into classified networks and tactical edge systems. Deep reinforcement learning fused with Bayesian inference frameworks enables real-time adaptive responses to emergent threats. This evolution manifests most acutely in cognitive-electronic warfare, the paramount axis of strategic competition as of mid-2026.
The electromagnetic spectrum, digital ecosystems, and human cognitive terrain now form a contiguous, hyper-connected battlespace. Generative AI and agentic swarms enable sub-second disinformation campaigns, leveraging psychological vulnerabilities such as loss aversion and framing effects to degrade an adversary's resolve and decision-making velocity. In the Ukrainian theatre, Russian Geran-2 (Shahed) and Lancet platforms integrate AI-driven target recognition with layered electronic warfare payloads, systematically contesting Starlink, GPS, and tactical communications. Ukrainian countermeasures emphasise decentralised “wolfpack” swarms leveraging mesh networking, visual odometry, and cognitive EW tools capable of channel spoofing and adaptive deception.

FRACTURED HORIZONS AND SHADOWS OUTLOOK
Scientific Mastery and the Metamorphosis of Warfare Reckoning Late 2026.
Author: Giovambattista Scuticchio Foderaro . Founder . President . Director at CENTER for GLOBAL STUDIES & Applied Sciences
Associate Member at CENTRO STUDI ESERCITO . ITALIAN ARMY STUDIES CENTER
NATO and aligned partners prioritise spectrum resilience through quantum-resistant cryptography, cognitive radios, adaptive frequency agility, and software-defined EW platforms. The fusion of behavioural analytics with neuro-AI, incorporating EEG-derived models and digital phenotyping, enables predictive disruption of information operations. Strategic deterrence increasingly pivots toward mutually assured cognitive disruption, in which superiority in perceptual dominance and decision advantage is accorded parity with kinetic superiority.
The United States advances multi-billion-dollar programmes, including Dark Eagle, HAVOC, and FLASH, to field operational assets exceeding Mach 5. Hypersonic systems have ascended to the apex of capability prioritisation, breakthroughs in computational fluid dynamics, advanced thermal protection systems, and ultra-high-temperature ceramics progressively surmount the formidable aerodynamic and thermodynamic barriers.

As peer competitors, China fields analogous glide vehicles and scramjet-powered cruise missiles like GUAM and DF-HGV, meanwhile, Russia recently delivered the Oreshnik nuclear-capable intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM), which, according to Moscow, travels at hypersonic speeds (around Mach 10 or higher) and can evade modern air defense systems.
The parallel development of counter-hypersonic architectures, integrating AI-orchestrated sensor networks, directed-energy effectors, and proliferated tracking constellations, assumes equivalent urgency. These systems compress the observe-orient-decide-act (OODA) loop to near-instantaneity, synergising with autonomous platforms to impose unpredictable, high-tempo pressure on adversary command architectures.
Initiatives such as DARPA’s HARQ programme advance heterogeneous qubit architectures toward fault-tolerant, scalable computation. Quantum key distribution (QKD) protocols furnish interception-resistant communications, while atom-interferometry sensors enhance inertial navigation, intelligence collection, and stealth detection in contested electromagnetic environments. In the space domain, quantum gravimetry and atom-interferometer systems offer unprecedented capabilities for anomaly-based tracking of manoeuvring assets, which is critical for persistent surveillance in GPS-denied scenarios.
Space has irrevocably evolved from a supportive enabler to a primary warfighting domain, and counter-space operations, co-orbital shadowing, directed-energy dazzling, communications jamming, and cyber probing occur with institutional regularity.
China pursues aggressive proliferation in low Earth orbit (LEO), and Guowang (China SatNet) has attained approximately 168 operational satellites en route to ambitions exceeding 13.000, while Qianfan (Thousand Sails) contributes 126-144 platforms toward broader targets of 10.000-15.000 spacecraft. These mega-constellations underpin resilient C2, ISR, and dual-use kill webs seamlessly fused with terrestrial forces.
Russia sustains direct-ascent ASAT development alongside co-orbital assets such as Luch, exercising restraint in destructive testing post-2021 Cosmos 1408 precedent.
The US Space Force counters through the Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture (PWSA), Silent Barker GEO surveillance, enhanced terrestrial sensors, and deepened commercial integration for superior Space Domain Awareness (SDA).
AI-augmented SDA platforms synthesise multi-intelligence feeds (radar, electro-optical, RF, commercial) for advanced conjunction assessment, anomaly detection, and Bayesian intent inference amid an orbital catalogue expanding toward tens of thousands of objects. On-orbit servicing and robotic assembly, exemplified by Northrop Grumman’s Mission Extension Vehicles, blur the demarcation between sustainment and rapid reconstitution. Nonetheless, systemic risks persist, as agent-based modelling indicates that even limited kinetic engagements in geostationary orbit could catalyse Kessler syndrome cascades with nonlinear global repercussions. Mitigation imperatives encompass diversified, manoeuvrable, proliferated constellations, active debris remediation, autonomous operations, and the cultivation of fragile normative restraints.
FRACTURED HORIZONS AND SHADOWS OUTLOOK
Scientific Mastery and the Metamorphosis of Warfare Reckoning Late 2026.
Author: Giovambattista Scuticchio Foderaro . Founder . President . Director at CENTER for GLOBAL STUDIES & Applied Sciences
Associate Member at CENTRO STUDI ESERCITO . ITALIAN ARMY STUDIES CENTER

Simultaneous revolutions in synthetic biology and human augmentation are recalibrating the human factor itself. CRISPR-enabled gene editing and synthetic biology platforms explore dual-use enhancements: hypoxia tolerance, accelerated tissue regeneration, and cognitive resilience under conditions of sleep deprivation or extreme G-forces. China’s Military-Civil Fusion strategy aggressively advances “super-soldier” initiatives, incorporating tardigrade-derived genetic elements to enhance radiation resilience and broader performance. The US maintains a more calibrated approach, exemplified by DARPA’s Safe Genes programme, which stresses ethical guardrails, countermeasures, and defensive applications.
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), whether non-invasive or minimally invasive, facilitate thought-to-action control, swarm orchestration, and shared cognitive awareness in human-AI collectives (dramatically attenuating latency); cognitive warfare conceptualises the mind as contested terrain, invoking deep ethical and legal dilemmas. Physiologic intelligence (PHYSIOINT) and neuro-AI further embed human cognition into the operational continuum, while vulnerabilities include neuro-cyber side-channel attacks, adversarial neural manipulation, and cognitive data exfiltration.
Biosecurity risks scale commensurately, because synthetic biology democratises the engineering of enhanced or novel pathogens capable of targeted physiological disruption or material degradation. AI-generated proteins circumvent conventional sequence screening, while portable CRISPR diagnostics present dual-use proliferation hazards. Stochastic risk modelling underscores the necessity of function-based screening protocols, robust global surveillance networks, and agile biomanufacturing capacities.
Orbital platforms may host biotech sensing arrays, quantum systems, secure neural data streams, AI-integrated space-derived awareness with cognitive telemetry for unparalleled decision frames. Hypersonic effectors exploit cognitive-electronic windows of vulnerability, and grey-zone theatres illustrate how electronic resilience, autonomous systems, and human augmentation generate asymmetric leverage across the conflict spectrum.
Great-power competition propels technological maturation at a “pace that outpaces” governance frameworks, as proliferated architectures, quantum edges, and bio-hybrid capabilities mature toward 2030, cascading hazards necessitate proactive and integrated strategies (orbital debris avalanches, bio-engineered threats, cognitive manipulation and so on). Diversified capability investment, ethical architectures that reconcile innovation with safeguards, and pragmatic, interest-based international cooperation represent essential pillars for navigating this high-stakes environment.
The actor that most coherently integrates these converging scientific-military frontiers will command decisive systemic advantage in the strategic competitions of the coming decade. At the CENTER for GLOBAL STUDIES & Applied Sciences, we maintain that rigorous, multidisciplinary foresight remains indispensable for responsible stewardship of these transformative technologies.

FRACTURED HORIZONS AND SHADOWS OUTLOOK
Scientific Mastery and the Metamorphosis of Warfare Reckoning Late 2026.
Author: Giovambattista Scuticchio Foderaro . Founder . President . Director at CENTER for GLOBAL STUDIES & Applied Sciences
Associate Member at CENTRO STUDI ESERCITO . ITALIAN ARMY STUDIES CENTER
WW Conflicts Synopsis, Tech Frontiers, Brainstorming Futures.
As of May 2026, approximately 14 major active conflicts and over 130 total armed conflicts persist globally, more than double the number 15 years ago and the humanitarian tolls mount, with millions displaced, widespread missing persons, and generations shaped by perpetual war. Scientific and technical acceleration collides with these realities, transforming conflict into multidimensional contests.
Ongoing conflicts continue to serve as proving grounds and accelerators for these technologies, as recent demonstrations of AI-orchestrated quantum calibration and multi-agent orchestration highlight accelerating discovery velocity. Scientific and Technological Mastery can deliver temporary advantages, but nonlinearity, entropy, second-order effects, and adaptive adversaries ultimately shape long-term outcomes.
Chaos theory underscores how disinformation cascades, or single drone swarms, trigger nonlinear escalations. Neuroscience-informed cognitive warfare - exploiting biases via prospect theory - gains prominence in grey zones. Deterrence shifts toward “mutually assured disruption”, with entropy in information and cognitive domains as key power metrics. Bayesian predictive analytics highlight rising probabilities in cyber-physical, orbital, and bio-hybrid domains.
Agent-based simulations, “Monte Carlo methods”, and stochastic game-theoretic models forecast persistent hybridity; at VR CORPORATENEXT, we analyse the conflicts and the different reports using these applied methods to reach multifractional scenarios for each event, changing the forecastable insight hourly, daily, and weekly. In the fractured mid-2026 environment, marked by post-war realignments, deep strikes, and persistent multipolar frictions, the side that best integrates rapid discovery with disciplined foresight, resilience, and strategic coherence will hold the decisive edge. Miscalculation, however, risks rapid, cascading escalation across interconnected domains.
In Ukraine, the war grinds into its fifth year with Russian advances in Donetsk slowed dramatically (averaging 2,9 km²/day early 2026, with net losses in April), countered by Ukrainian deep strikes as Azov Corps operations 95-160 km into occupied territory using drones (over 1,300 in single operations), deep logistics interdiction, “return” to Mariupol, targeting supply routes and so on. Short ceasefires (May 9-11 for Victory Day and POW exchanges) highlight fragile de-escalation windows amid infrastructure targeting.
Ukrainian deep-strike campaigns have intensified, launching massive drone swarms targeting Russian oil refineries, energy infrastructure, missile production, and even Moscow-region assets. Russia maintains maximalist demands for full Ukrainian withdrawal from Donbas as a precondition for talks while conducting joint nuclear exercises with Belarus; both sides leverage drones, EW systems, and long-range precision strikes in a high-attrition contest.
The Post-Iran War Dynamics see a major US-Israel military operation against Iran earlier in 2026 (Operation “Epic Fury”) significantly degraded Iranian leadership and capabilities before a fragile ceasefire took hold in April-May. Tensions persist with IRGC threats, Strait of Hormuz manoeuvring (including transit fees and blockades), and recurring Israel-Hezbollah clashes in southern Lebanon, despite US-brokered ceasefire extensions where targeted killings of Hamas and Islamic Jihad figures continue alongside localised ground actions. Iran has asserted greater control over the Strait of Hormuz through a controversial “protection racket” fee system enforced by the IRGC, though maritime traffic is slowly normalising. Direct US-Iran negotiations, described by President Trump as “largely negotiated” as of May 23rd, focus on reopening the strait fully and long-term de-escalation.

In Lebanon, the ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah has been extended multiple times, most recently by 45 days. However, sporadic violence persists, and Israeli strikes in southern Lebanon, including a deadly May 19th attack in Nabatieh that killed 21 people, have pushed the death toll since March past 3,000. Hezbollah continues limited rocket and drone operations, while Israeli forces maintain a presence along a “yellow line” encompassing around 55 southern villages, where ground engagements, such as the recent defense of Haddatha, highlight the fragility of the truce.
Gaza faces renewed fears of escalation as Hamas disarmament talks stall, and intermittent Israeli strikes on targets in central areas like Nuseirat and Bureij continue despite the broader regional ceasefire, exacerbating the humanitarian crisis.
Gulf states, including Saudi Arabia, reportedly conducted quiet, supportive strikes during the Iran campaign, where Iranian proxy networks are degraded but show signs of rapid rebuilding, with IRGC leveraging Hormuz control as a key bargaining chip in ongoing talks.
The Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen largely scaled back Red Sea shipping attacks following the October 2025 Gaza ceasefire but resumed limited operations against Israel in March 2026 in solidarity during the Iran war. Missile and drone launches targeted Israeli sites, though no major resumption of broad maritime disruptions has occurred recently. Houthi leaders have praised the Iran ceasefire as a “victory” while warning of future escalations if Israel or the US target the “Axis of Resistance”.
Houthis maintain a rapid-redeployment capability for the Strait of Bab el-Mandeb threats, with coastal missile infrastructure intact. Coordination with a weakened Iran is strained, but economic pressures in Houthi-controlled areas are boosting recruitment. Internally, the Houthis retain firm control over northern Yemen, with ongoing tensions in the south involving Saudi/UAE-backed factions like the Southern Transitional Council (STC). Limited prisoner swaps continue under UN facilitation, but broader political progress remains stalled - with a no-safe-rehabilitation plan forecasted for the ordinary Hormuz flows.
In Sudan, the civil war between SAF and RSF enters its fourth year with no resolution in sight, spilling across the border into Chad, destabilising the country and threatening its government. Drone strikes, urban fighting, and famine/genocide-level humanitarian catastrophe affect tens of millions, with displacement and aid needs escalating. While in Myanmar, the resistance forces (PDFs and ethnic armed organisations) continue eroding Tatmadaw control across much of the country. The junta's attempts at legitimisation through controlled elections have failed to quell widespread conflict and territorial losses.
Persistent insurgencies and governance breakdowns in the Sahel continue to drive hybrid threats and migration pressures, as in Mali. Jihadist insurgencies in the Sahel have reached a dangerous new phase, marked by sophisticated coordination and territorial gains. In late April 2026, al-Qaeda-linked Jama’ at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM) and Tuareg separatists from the Azawad Liberation Front launched nationwide attacks in Mali, killing Defense Minister Sadio Camara, overrunning bases near Tessalit, and forcing Russian/Wagner withdrawals from northern positions.
Similar jihadist gains persist in Burkina Faso and Niger, with expanding cross-border operations through violence spilling across borders with JNIM expanding southward. Technological defense strategies centre on drone ISR/strikes (Turkish/Chinese systems) and AI predictive tools by state forces, countered by insurgents’ growing use of commercial drones with AI-visual navigation that evades jamming. Weak governance and ineffective security responses have allowed armed groups to expand, and neighbouring areas such as north-western Nigeria and the Lake Chad Basin are also affected by militant activity and humanitarian crises.
What began as a security response, closing the border with Sudan, has evolved into a far broader challenge, representing an existential threat to Chad’s stability and to President Mahamat Idriss Déby’s hold on power. The conflict is rapidly metastasising, with serious consequences not only for Chad but also for the wider region, including the AES-CEN-SAD countries.
This “autonomy pivot” favours hard-kill countermeasures and offline AI capabilities, as these dynamics displace millions, fuel famine and trafficking networks, and risk spillover into coastal West Africa, amplifying migration flows toward Europe. Long-term containment demands integrated tech-human strategies alongside governance fixes. Pragmatic JNIM-Tuareg alliances, despite ideological clashes, reflect shared anti-junta goals and could accelerate fragmentation. Russian forces show signs of logistical strain, with drone-enabled jihadist tactics proving increasingly effective against conventional positions.
In the Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda-backed M23 rebels continue to consolidate control over much of North Kivu, including Goma, despite fragile ceasefire attempts under the Washington Accords and Qatar-mediated talks. Recent US diplomatic pressure prompted limited M23 withdrawals from some positions, but fighting with FARDC forces persists. M23 has built parallel governance structures, recruited locally, and secured revenue from mineral-rich areas. The Allied Democratic Forces (ADF), an ISIS affiliate, expands in adjacent regions, worsening the humanitarian disaster with mass displacement and atrocities.
Mineral economies fundamentally drive the conflict, with M23 generating substantial monthly income from its control of mines (US interests in critical minerals create mixed incentives regarding pressure on Rwanda) - forecasts see permanent territorial fracture risks remain high if parallel administrations solidify.

FRACTURED HORIZONS AND SHADOWS OUTLOOK
Scientific Mastery and the Metamorphosis of Warfare Reckoning Late 2026.
Author: Giovambattista Scuticchio Foderaro . Founder . President . Director at CENTER for GLOBAL STUDIES & Applied Sciences
Associate Member at CENTRO STUDI ESERCITO . ITALIAN ARMY STUDIES CENTER
In the Taiwan/China conflict, grey-zone pressure (air and naval incursions) persists amid debates over US arms sales and high-level diplomacy (including recent Trump-Xi engagements). Beijing emphasises “peaceful reunification” while warning against moves toward independence, with no signs of an imminent kinetic invasion but with sustained military modernisation. Multilateral institutions face further erosion amid geoeconomic fragmentation, tariff disputes, supply-chain reshoring, and great-power competition. Hybrid, cognitive, and informational operations - amplified by agentic AI - now dominate alongside kinetic domains.
Following the US Operation Absolute Resolve on January the 3rd, 2026, which included strikes on Venezuela, in Caracas, and the capture of Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Venezuela entered a turbulent post-Maduro phase.
As of late May, US forces have conducted drills around Caracas, framed as evacuation exercises; the Trump administration has signaled limited appetite for deep nation-building, focusing instead on oil infrastructure repairs and transitional stability. Regional criticism over the intervention’s legality persists, alongside domestic power struggles. The operation is viewed internally as “regime change on the cheap”, with opposition leaders like Maria Corina Machado largely sidelined. Lingering Maduro loyalists and Cuban influence networks complicate the full consolidation of transitional authority.
The proliferation of low-cost autonomy represents a particularly destabilising development, as swarm-capable UAVs equipped with onboard visual navigation, terrain-relative positioning, and local inference models increasingly operate without continuous satellite or radio links, reducing vulnerability to jamming and electronic warfare. Counterparties are also experimenting with cooperative machine behaviours, distributed kill-chain architectures, and adaptive targeting logic capable of re-tasking missions dynamically under degraded conditions. This shifts strategic emphasis from platform superiority alone toward resilient networks, hardened infrastructure, edge computing, and AI-enabled defensive interception systems.

Shadows of Convergence and the Reckoning Ahead.
As 2026 draws toward its midpoint, what was once the domain of discrete military platforms has become a hyper-convergent battlespace where agentic AI, quantum systems, hypersonic kinetics, synthetic biology, and cognitive operations reinforce one another in real time. The grinding attrition and ongoing conflicts serve as brutal accelerators, revealing both the promise and the peril of this technological convergence.
Nations and non-state actors that master the integration of these domains, compressing OODA loops, hardening resilient architectures, and fusing human cognition with machine intelligence, will likely secure decisive advantages in the coming decade. Yet this same convergence carries profound risks as rapid proliferation of dual-use capabilities, erosion of strategic stability, cognitive sovereignty under siege, and the ever-present specter of nonlinear escalation. Low-cost autonomy, bio-digital enhancements, and quantum-enabled informational asymmetry are democratising destructive power in ways that challenge traditional deterrence and governance frameworks.
The path forward demands more than mere technological superiority. It requires disciplined foresight, antifragile system design, verifiable safeguards for autonomy, and selective transparency mechanisms capable of matching the velocity of innovation itself. Ethical-technical guardrails, rigorous red-teaming, and cognitive resilience must become core components of national strategy, not afterthoughts. Ultimately, the decisive variable in this era of fractured horizons will not be raw computational power or material breakthroughs, but the moral and strategic wisdom to wield unprecedented capability without triggering cascading catastrophe.
In this shadowed outlook, Scientific Mastery offers humanity tools of extraordinary potential - yet it also confronts us with an ancient truth sharpened by modern velocity: power without restraint is indistinguishable from self-destruction. The choices made in the closing years of this decade will determine whether the metamorphosis of warfare leads to a more stable, if competitive, order, or to a world where shadows lengthen beyond recovery. The horizon remains fractured, but not yet sealed.
The reckoning is here, about now, this momentum.
May, 2026
Giovambattista Scuticchio Foderaro
Founder . President . Director at CENTER for GLOBAL STUDIES & Applied Sciences
Associate Member at CENTRO STUDI ESERCITO . ITALIAN ARMY STUDIES CENTER

All rights reserved . CENTER for GLOBAL STUDIES & Applied Sciences . VR CORPORATENEXT - IT15894711009 . © 2026 . A VR GROUP WORLDWIDE Company - Italy . UK +44 20 808 97 97 8
